Should Hezbollah be blamed for sparking the latest violence in the region or Israel for excessive use of force?
All these acts of violence against civilians in Lebanon forces more Muslims in middle east into believing Bin Laden's assertion that the West considers Muslim lives cheap and expendable. This would make them see in a way that three kidnapped Israeli soldiers and several dozen dead Israelis are worth infinitely more to the West than the thousands of Muslims held for years in Israel's prisons, the hundreds already killed in Lebanon, and the eradication of Lebanon's modern infrastructure.
Noticing the numbers of Israeli bombs that have fallen on Lebanese homes, roads, bridges, ports, broadcasting towers, it overshadows Israel's strikes on the offices and rocket launchers of Hezbollah guerrillas, whose capture of two Israeli soldiers triggered the attacks.
Iran can be blamed for so-called promoting instability throughout the region like supporting Hezbollah militias, but is it Hezbollah that is using U.S.-built F-16s, with precision-guided bombs, and 155-mm artillery pieces to cause death and destruction on Lebanon?
This week-old Israeli-Hezbollah conflict is likely to increase the chances of U.S. military action against Iran. This is the beginning of what was a very similar process in the period, between terrorist attacks against New York and the Pentagon and the Iraq war. When neo-cons led the formation of the public opinion after the 11th September attacks that war with Iraq was a necessary part of remaking the Middle East to prevent future 9/11s, it is very possible that a similar consensus to war with Iraq could develop over the next few years, if not the next few months, about the necessity to confront Iran.
All these acts of violence against civilians in Lebanon forces more Muslims in middle east into believing Bin Laden's assertion that the West considers Muslim lives cheap and expendable. This would make them see in a way that three kidnapped Israeli soldiers and several dozen dead Israelis are worth infinitely more to the West than the thousands of Muslims held for years in Israel's prisons, the hundreds already killed in Lebanon, and the eradication of Lebanon's modern infrastructure.
Noticing the numbers of Israeli bombs that have fallen on Lebanese homes, roads, bridges, ports, broadcasting towers, it overshadows Israel's strikes on the offices and rocket launchers of Hezbollah guerrillas, whose capture of two Israeli soldiers triggered the attacks.
Iran can be blamed for so-called promoting instability throughout the region like supporting Hezbollah militias, but is it Hezbollah that is using U.S.-built F-16s, with precision-guided bombs, and 155-mm artillery pieces to cause death and destruction on Lebanon?
This week-old Israeli-Hezbollah conflict is likely to increase the chances of U.S. military action against Iran. This is the beginning of what was a very similar process in the period, between terrorist attacks against New York and the Pentagon and the Iraq war. When neo-cons led the formation of the public opinion after the 11th September attacks that war with Iraq was a necessary part of remaking the Middle East to prevent future 9/11s, it is very possible that a similar consensus to war with Iraq could develop over the next few years, if not the next few months, about the necessity to confront Iran.